Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2017, Vol. 14 Issue (3): 419-430    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-017-0632-y
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
3D anisotropic modeling and identification for airborne EM systems based on the spectral-element method
Huang Xin1, Yin Chang-Chun1, Cao Xiao-Yue1, Liu Yun-He1, Zhang Bo1, and Cai Jing1
1. College of Geo-exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China.
 Download: PDF (1223 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The airborne electromagnetic (AEM) method has a high sampling rate and survey flexibility. However, traditional numerical modeling approaches must use high-resolution physical grids to guarantee modeling accuracy, especially for complex geological structures such as anisotropic earth. This can lead to huge computational costs. To solve this problem, we propose a spectral-element (SE) method for 3D AEM anisotropic modeling, which combines the advantages of spectral and finite-element methods. Thus, the SE method has accuracy as high as that of the spectral method and the ability to model complex geology inherited from the finite-element method. The SE method can improve the modeling accuracy within discrete grids and reduce the dependence of modeling results on the grids. This helps achieve high-accuracy anisotropic AEM modeling. We first introduced a rotating tensor of anisotropic conductivity to Maxwell’s equations and described the electrical field via SE basis functions based on GLL interpolation polynomials. We used the Galerkin weighted residual method to establish the linear equation system for the SE method, and we took a vertical magnetic dipole as the transmission source for our AEM modeling. We then applied fourth-order SE calculations with coarse physical grids to check the accuracy of our modeling results against a 1D semi-analytical solution for an anisotropic half-space model and verified the high accuracy of the SE. Moreover, we conducted AEM modeling for different anisotropic 3D abnormal bodies using two physical grid scales and three orders of SE to obtain the convergence conditions for different anisotropic abnormal bodies. Finally, we studied the identification of anisotropy for single anisotropic abnormal bodies, anisotropic surrounding rock, and single anisotropic abnormal body embedded in an anisotropic surrounding rock. This approach will play a key role in the inversion and interpretation of AEM data collected in regions with anisotropic geology.
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Key wordsSpectral-element method   anisotropy   frequency-domain AEM   GLL interpolation basis function   forward modeling     
Received: 2017-05-21;

This work was financially supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41530320), China Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists (No. 41404093), and Key National Research Project of China (Nos. 2016YFC0303100 and 2017YFC0601900), and China Natural Science Foundation (No. 41774125).

Cite this article:   
. 3D anisotropic modeling and identification for airborne EM systems based on the spectral-element method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(3): 419-430.
No references of article
[1] Wang Tao, Wang Kun-Peng, Tan Han-Dong. Forward modeling and inversion of tensor CSAMT in 3D anisotropic media[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 590-605.
[2] Qian Ke-Ran, He Zhi-Liang, Chen Ye-Quan, Liu Xi-Wu, Li Xiang-Yang. Prediction of brittleness based on anisotropic rock physics model for kerogen-rich shale[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 463-480.
[3] Huang Wei, Ben Fang, Yin Chang-Chun, Meng Qing-Min, Li Wen-Jie, Liao Gui-Xiang, Wu Shan, Xi Yong-Zai. Three-dimensional arbitrarily anisotropic modeling for time-domain airborne electromagnetic surveys[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(3): 431-440.
[4] Su Ben-Yu and Yue Jian-Hua. Research of the electrical anisotropic characteristics of water-conducting fractured zones in coal seams[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(2): 216-224.
[5] Fang Gang, Ba Jing, Liu Xin-Xin, Zhu Kun, Liu Guo-Chang. Seismic wavefield modeling based on time-domain symplectic  and Fourier finite-difference method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(2): 258-269.
[6] Song Lian-Teng, Liu Zhong-Hua, Zhou Can-Can, Yu Jun, Xiu Li-Jun, Sun Zhong-Chun, Zhang Hai-Tao. Analysis of elastic anisotropy of tight sandstone and the influential factors[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 10-20.
[7] Liu Xi-Wu, Guo Zhi-Qi, Liu Cai, Liu Yu-Wei. Anisotropy rock physics model for the Longmaxi shale gas reservoir, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 21-30.
[8] He Yi-Yuan, Hu Tian-Yue, He Chuan, Tan Yu-Yang. P-wave attenuation anisotropy in TI media and its application in fracture parameters inversion[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 649-657.
[9] Sergey Yaskevich, Georgy Loginov, Anton Duchkov, Alexandr Serdukov. Pitfalls of microseismic data inversion in the case of strong anisotropy[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 326-332.
[10] Guo Zhi-Qi, Liu Cai, Liu Xi-Wu, Dong Ning, and Liu Yu-Wei. Research on anisotropy of shale oil reservoir based on rock physics model[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 382-392.
[11] Yin Chang-Chun, Zhang Ping, Cai Jing. Forward modeling of marine DC resistivity method for a layered anisotropic earth[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 279-287.
[12] Li Sheng-Jie, Shao Yu, Chen Xu-Qiang. Anisotropic rock physics models for interpreting pore structures in carbonate reservoirs[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(1): 166-178.
[13] Li Wen-Ben, Zeng Zhao-Fa, Li Jing, Chen Xiong, Wang Kun, Xia Zhao. 2.5D forward modeling and inversion of frequency-domain airborne electromagnetic data[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(1): 37-47.
[14] Guo Zhi-Qi, Liu Xi-Wu, Fu Wei, Li Xiang-Yang. Modeling and analysis of azimuthal AVO responses from a viscoelastic anisotropic reflector[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(3): 441-452.
[15] Zhu Chao, Guo Qing-Xin, Gong Qing-Shun, Liu Zhan-Guo, Li Sen-Ming, Huang Ge-Ping. Prestack forward modeling of tight reservoirs based on the Xu–White model[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 12(3): 421-431.
Support by Beijing Magtech