Home  |  Copyright  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Indexed-in  |  Subscriptions  |  Download  |  Contacts Us  |  中文
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS  2018, Vol. 15 Issue (2): 197-207    DOI: 10.1007/s11770-018-0674-9
article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Wideband dipole logging based on segment linear frequency modulation excitation
Cao Xue-Shen1,2,3, Chen Hao1,2,3, Li Ping1,2, He Hong-Bin1,3, Zhou Yin-Qiu1,3, and Wang Xiu-Ming1,2,3
1. State Key Laboratory of Acoustics, Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
3. Beijing Engineering Research Center of sea deep drilling and exploration, Beijing 100190, China.
 Download: PDF (1213 KB)   HTML ( KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract A wideband dipole signal is required for dipole dispersion correction and near-borehole imaging. To obtain the broadband flexural wave dispersion, we use a nonlinear frequency modulation (NLFM) signal and propose a segment linear frequency modulation (SLFM) signal as the dipole excitation signal to compensate for the excitation intensity. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the signal over the entire frequency band is increased. The finite-difference method is used to simulate the responses from a Ricker wavelet, a linear frequency modulation (LFM) signal, an NLFM signal, and an SLFM signal in two borehole models of a homogeneously hard formation and a radially stratified formation. The dispersion and radial tomography results at low SNR of the sound source signals are compared. Numerical modeling suggests that the energy of the flexural waves excited by the Ricker wavelet source is concentrated near the Airy phase. In this case, the dispersion is incomplete and information regarding the formation near or far from the borehole cannot be obtained. The LFM signal yields dispersion information near the Airy phase and the high-frequency range but not in the low-frequency range. Moreover, the information regarding the formation far from the borehole is not accurate. The NLFM signal extends the frequency range of the flexural waves by compensating for the excitation intensity and yields information regarding the formation information, but it is not easy to obtain. The SLFM signal yields the same results as the NLFM signal and is easier to implement. Consequently, the dipole detection range expands and the S-wave velocity calculation accuracy improves.
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Key wordsDipole acoustic logging   dispersion   frequency modulation   finite difference     
Received: 2017-12-10;

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11574347, 11734017, 91630308, and 11374322), the Youth Talent Project of the Institute of Acoustics of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. QNYC201619), and the PetroChina Innovation Foundation (No. 2016D-5007-0304).

Cite this article:   
. Wideband dipole logging based on segment linear frequency modulation excitation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 197-207.
[1] Angona, F. A., Zemanek, J., 1987, Shear wave acoustic logging system: US 4649525.
[2] Chen, X. L., and Wang, R. J., 2008, Investigating depth of mode waves in the borehole surrounded by transversely isotropic elastic formation: Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition) (in Chinese), 38(3), 502−507.
[3] Cheng, X. Y., Ju, X. D., Lu, J. Q., et al., 2007, Design of downhole multipole acoustic transducer transmitter with high power: Journal of China University Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 31(6), 40−43.
[4] Cook, C. E., and Bernfeld, M., 1967, Radar Signals: An introduction to theory and application: Academic Press, New York, 34−45.
[5] Dai, N., Vafidis, A., and Kanasewich, E. R., 1995, Wave propagation in heterogeneous, porous media: A velocity-stress, finite-difference method: Geophysics, 60(2), 327−340.
[6] Du, Q. Z., Lin, B., and Hou, B., 2009, Numerical modeling of seismic wavefields in transversely isotropic media with a compact staggered−grid finite difference scheme: Applied Geophysics, 6(1), 42−49.
[7] Fowle, E. N., 1964, The design of FM pulse-compression signals: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 10(1), 61−67.
[8] Franco, J. L. A., Ortiz, M. A. M., De, G. S., et al., 2006, Sonic investigations in and around the borehole: Oilfield Review, 18(1), 14−31.
[9] Ikegami, T., 2003, Acoustic frequency selection in acoustic logging tools: US 6510104.
[10] Kurkjian, A. L., and Chang, S. K., 1987, Method and apparatus for acoustic dipole shear wave well logging: US 4698792.
[11] Lin, M. Y., and Ke, Y. A., 1984, Radar signal theory:National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 199−203.
[12] Lu, J. Q., Ju, X. D., and Cheng, X. Y., 2009, Transducer firing method for multipole array acoustic logging tool: High Voltage Engineering. (in Chinese), 35(2), 324−328.
[13] Ma, M. M., Chen, H, He, X., et al., 2013, The inversion of shear wave slowness′s radial variations based on the dipole flexural mode dispersion: Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(6), 2077−2087
[14] Men, B. Y., Ju, X. D., Qiao, W. X., et al., 2013, Transducer excitation method for 3D acoustic logging sonde: Technical Acoustics. (in Chinese), 32(5), 390−394.
[15] Sun, B. C., Wang, R. J., Li, W., et al., 2016, Ultra broadband acoustic logging tool for deep reading formation evaluation sign in required: Offshore Technology Conference, OTC−26688.
[16] Tang, X. M., and Cheng, C. H., 2004, Quantitative borehole acoustic methods: Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., San Diego, 22−31.
[17] Tang, X. M., and Patterson, D. J., 2010, Mapping formation radial shear-wave velocity variation by a constrained inversion of borehole flexural-wave dispersion data: Geophysics, 75(6), E183−E190.
[18] Tao, G., Gao, K., Wang, B., et al., 2007, Application of multipole array sonic logging to acid hydralic fracturing: Applied Geophysics, 4(2), 133−137.
[19] Vizitiu, I. C., Anton, L., Popescu, F., et al., 2012, The synthesis of some NLFM laws using the stationary phase principle: International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications, IEEE, 377−380.
[20] Walker, K., Granville, J., Kainer, G., et al., 2015, Towards the 3D measurement of formation properties in high-resolution with a continuous depth of Investigation: 90th SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE−175093−MS.
[21] Wang, B., Ma, M. M., Liu, H., et al., 2016, Inversion of the shear velocity radial profile in a cased borehole: Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 59(12), 4782−4790.
[22] Wang, J., Chen, D. H., Zhang, H. L., et al., 2012, Studies on phase and group velocities from acoustic logging: Applied Geophysics, 9(1), 108−113.
[23] Wei, D., and Zhou, Z. G., 2012, Application of non-linear frequency-modulation based pulse compression in air-coupled ultrasonic testing: Journal of Mechanical Engineering (in Chinese), 48(16), 8−13.
[24] Zhang, H. L., Wang, X. M., and Zhang, B. X., 2004, Acoustic field and wave in borehole: Science Press, Beijing, 88−89.
[1] Ma Xiao-Yi, Wang Shang-Xu, Zhao Jian-Guo, Yin Han-Jun, and Zhao Li-Ming. Velocity dispersion and fluid substitution in sandstone under partially saturated conditions[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 188-196.
[2] Li Xin-Xin and Li Qing-Chun. Active-source Rayleigh wave dispersion by the Aki spectral formulation[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 290-298.
[3] Ren Ying-Jun, Huang Jian-Ping, Yong Peng, Liu Meng-Li, Cui Chao, and Yang Ming-Wei. Optimized staggered-grid finite-difference operators using window functions[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(2): 253-260.
[4] Wang Bao-Li. Automatic pickup of arrival time of channel wave based on multi-channel constraints[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 15(1): 118-124.
[5] Sun Cheng-Yu, Wang Yan-Yan, Wu Dun-Shi, Qin Xiao-Jun. Nonlinear Rayleigh wave inversion based on the shuffled frog-leaping algorithm[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 551-558.
[6] Wang Tao, Wang Kun-Peng, Tan Han-Dong. Forward modeling and inversion of tensor CSAMT in 3D anisotropic media[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(4): 590-605.
[7] Fang Gang, Ba Jing, Liu Xin-Xin, Zhu Kun, Liu Guo-Chang. Seismic wavefield modeling based on time-domain symplectic  and Fourier finite-difference method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(2): 258-269.
[8] Zhang Yu, Ping Ping, Zhang Shuang-Xi. Finite-difference modeling of surface waves in poroelastic media and stress mirror conditions[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 105-114.
[9] Zhang Jian-Min, He Bing-Shou, Tang Huai-Gu. Pure quasi-P wave equation and numerical solution in 3D TTI media[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 125-132.
[10] Chen Hui, Deng Ju-Zhi Yin Min, Yin Chang-Chun, Tang Wen-Wu. Three-dimensional forward modeling of DC resistivity using the aggregation-based algebraic multigrid method[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 154-164.
[11] Meng Qing-Xin, Hu Xiang-Yun, Pan He-Ping, Zhou Feng. 10.1007/s11770-017-0600-6[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 14(1): 175-186.
[12] Tao Bei, Chen De-Hua, He Xiao, Wang Xiu-Ming. Rough interfaces and ultrasonic imaging logging behind casing[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(4): 683-688.
[13] Chang Jiang-Hao, Yu Jing-Cun, Liu Zhi-Xin. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of full-space transient electromagnetic responses of water in goaf[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(3): 539-552.
[14] Wang Tao, Tan Han-Dong, Li Zhi-Qiang, Wang Kun-Peng, Hu Zhi-Ming, Zhang Xing-Dong. 3D finite-difference modeling algorithm and anomaly features of ZTEM[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(3): 553-560.
[15] . Seismic dynamic monitoring in CO2 flooding based on characterization of frequency-dependent velocity factor[J]. APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 13(2): 307-314.
Support by Beijing Magtech